Write in a clean editor, then format for Animal Welfare in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Animal Welfare is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies, Human-Animal Interaction Studies, Animal Nutrition and Physiology.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Animal Welfare 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Animal Welfare has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies Human-Animal Interaction Studies Animal Nutrition and Physiology Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Animal testing and alternatives |
| ISSN | 0962-7286 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 2.38 |
| h-index | 102 |
| i10-index | 1,152 |
| Total citations | 58,391 |
| Open access | Yes |
| Top institutions publishing here | Universities Federation for Animal Welfare |
| Journal website | www.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Abstract Scientific research on ‘animal welfare’ began because of ethical concerns over the quality of life of animals, and the public looks to animal welfare research for guidance regarding these concerns. The conception of animal welfare used by scientists must relate closely to these ethical concerns if the orientation of the research and the interpretation…
Abstract We estimate that stereotypies are currently displayed by over 85 million farm, laboratory and zoo animals worldwide. This paper investigates their reliability as welfare indicators, by surveying studies relating stereotypy to other welfare measures and by analysing the mechanisms underlying this behaviour. Where data exist, most (approximately 68%) situations that cause/increase stereotypies also decrease…
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Abstract Contemporary animal welfare thinking is increasingly emphasising the promotion of positive states. There is a need for existing assessment frameworks to accommodate this shift in emphasis. This paper describes extensions to the Five Domains model, originally devised to assess welfare compromise, that facilitate consideration of positive experiences that may enhance welfare. As originally configured,…
