Write in a clean editor, then format for MDM Policy & Practice in one click — DocuGuru applies the official SAGE template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
MDM Policy & Practice is a peer-reviewed journal published by SAGE, covering Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare, Global Cancer Incidence and Screening.
| Publisher | SAGE |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Harvard) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, A., Jones, B. and Lee, C. (2023) 'A representative article title', MDM Policy & Practice, 12(3), pp. 45–58.
Formats any DOI in MDM Policy & Practice style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare Global Cancer Incidence and Screening Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues Healthcare Policy and Management |
| ISSN | 2381-4683 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.36 |
| h-index | 26 |
| i10-index | 106 |
| Total citations | 3,084 |
| Article processing charge | $2,500 |
| Open access | Yes |
| Top institutions publishing here | Harvard University |
| Journal website | us.sagepub.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately…
Background: Despite recently expanded access to health insurance, consumers still face barriers to using their coverage to obtain needed health care. Objective: To examine the characteristics of those who delay or avoid health care due to costs. Methods: Participants were recruited via Amazon MTurk and completed a survey assessing demographic characteristics, financial toxicity, health care…
One of the major hurdles to promoting informed decision making in health is the continued use of poor risk presentation formats. This article offers a guide to develop a Fact Box, a simple decision tool to present data about the benefits and harms of treatments that has been demonstrated to improve understanding of health risks,…
Background: This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a new, comprehensive measure of knowledge about genomic sequencing, the University of North Carolina Genomic Knowledge Scale (UNC-GKS). Methods: The UNC-GKS assesses knowledge in four domains thought to be critical for informed decision making about genomic sequencing. The scale was validated using classical test theory and item…
Objective. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is widely used for assessing quality of life in cancer. However, QLQ-C30 responses cannot be incorporated in cost-utility analysis because they are not based on general population’s preferences, or utilities. To overcome this limitation, the QLU-C10D, a cancer-specific utility algorithm, was derived from the QLQ-C30. The aim of this study was…
