Write in a clean editor, then format for Journal of law & empirical analysis. in one click — DocuGuru applies the official SAGE template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Journal of law & empirical analysis. is a peer-reviewed journal published by SAGE, covering Judicial and Constitutional Studies, Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems, Legal and Constitutional Studies.
| Publisher | SAGE |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Harvard) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, A., Jones, B. and Lee, C. (2023) 'A representative article title', Journal of law & empirical analysis., 12(3), pp. 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Journal of law & empirical analysis. style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Judicial and Constitutional Studies Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems Legal and Constitutional Studies Law in Society and Culture Artificial Intelligence in Law |
| Papers published last year | ≈19 |
| ISSN | 2755-323X |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.75 |
| h-index | 5 |
| i10-index | 3 |
| Total citations | 93 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Chicago |
| Journal website | journals.sagepub.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Generative AI is set to transform the legal profession, though its most promising uses and ultimate effects are still unclear. While AI models like GPT-4 improve efficiency, they can also “hallucinate” and may undermine legal judgment, particularly in complex tasks typically handled by skilled lawyers. This article examines two emerging AI innovations that may mitigate…
One of the key policing innovations of the last three decades has been community-oriented policing. It is particularly important because it is one of the only proactive policing approaches that consistently improves citizen evaluations of the police. At the same time, a series of reviews have concluded that there is not persuasive evidence that community…
Experimental research on judicial decision-making is hampered by the difficulty of recruiting judges as experimental participants. Can students be used in judges’ stead? Unfortunately, no—at least if the objective is to study legal reasoning. We ran the same high-context 2 × 2 factorial experiment of judicial decision-making focused on legal reasoning with 31 U.S. federal…
The allocative efficiency outcome predicted by the Coase theorem critically depends on the assumption that, barring high transaction costs, parties will bargain after litigation and misallocated entitlements by courts will be re-allocated through voluntary exchanges. Ward Farnsworth’s 1999 small-scale survey lent credence to the claim that parties do not bargain after litigation because of the…
The paper conceptualizes two distinct yet interconnected modes of judicial activism: courts as intervening in the policies and actions of other branches of government and courts as involved in their policymaking process. It proposes empirical methods to assess these modes and investigates them using a case study of Israeli Supreme Court justices’ votes from 2010…
