Background: Despite the promise of implementation science (IS) to reduce health inequities, critical gaps and opportunities remain in the field to promote health equity. Prioritizing racial equity and antiracism approaches is critical in these efforts, so that IS does not inadvertently exacerbate disparities based on the selection of frameworks, methods, interventions, and strategies that do…
Implementation Research and Practice Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Implementation Research and Practice in one click — DocuGuru applies the official SAGE template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Implementation Research and Practice format
Implementation Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed journal published by SAGE, covering Health Policy Implementation Science, Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Community Health and Development.
| Publisher | SAGE |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Harvard) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, A., Jones, B. and Lee, C. (2023) 'A representative article title', Implementation Research and Practice, 12(3), pp. 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Implementation Research and Practice style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Health Policy Implementation Science Mental Health and Patient Involvement Community Health and Development Digital Mental Health Interventions Behavioral and Psychological Studies |
| ISSN | 2633-4895 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 2.83 |
| h-index | 30 |
| i10-index | 87 |
| Total citations | 3,262 |
| Article processing charge | $1,500 |
| Open access | Yes |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Washington |
| Journal website | us.sagepub.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Implementation Research and Practice per year
Citation impact of Implementation Research and Practice by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Implementation Research and Practice
Background: The aim of this scoping review was to identify theories, models, and frameworks for understanding the processes and determinants of de-implementing low-value care (LVC). We investigated theories, models, and frameworks developed specifically for de-implementation of LVC (conceptual studies) and those that were originally developed for implementation of evidence-based practices but were applied in studies…
Background: Researchers have argued for the value of ethnographic approaches to implementation science (IS). The contested meanings of ethnography pose challenges and possibilities to its use in IS. The goal of this study was to identify sources of commonality and variation, and to distill a set of recommendations for reporting ethnographic approaches in IS. Methods:…
Background: The importance of having a champion to promote implementation efforts has been discussed in the literature for more than five decades. However, the empirical literature on champions remains underdeveloped. As a result, health organizations commonly use champions in their implementation efforts without the benefit of evidence to guide decisions about how to identify, prepare,…
Background: Most evidence-based practices in mental health are complex psychosocial interventions, but little research has focused on assessing and addressing the characteristics of these interventions, such as design quality and packaging, that serve as intra-intervention determinants (i.e., barriers and facilitators) of implementation outcomes. Usability—the extent to which a product can be used by specified users…