In January 1930 officials of the Bureau of Immigration testified about the Border Patrol before a closed session of the House Immigration Committee. Henry Hull, the commissioner general of immigration, explained that the Border Patrol did not operate “on the border line” but as far as one hundred miles “back of the line.” The Border…
Law and History Review Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Law and History Review in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Law and History Review format
Law and History Review is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering American Constitutional Law and Politics, Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies, Human auditory perception and evaluation.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Law and History Review 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Law and History Review has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | American Constitutional Law and Politics Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Human auditory perception and evaluation Judicial and Constitutional Studies Colonialism, slavery, and trade |
| ISSN | 0738-2480 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.3 |
| h-index | 48 |
| i10-index | 339 |
| Total citations | 12,126 |
| Top institutions publishing here | American Bar Foundation |
| Journal website | journals.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Law and History Review per year
Citation impact of Law and History Review by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Law and History Review
What role did the Roman legal concept of res nullius (things without owners), or the related concept of terra nullius (land without owners), play in the context of early modern European expansion? Scholars have provided widely different answers to this question. Some historians have argued that European claims based on terra nullius became a routine…
On July 10, 1833, an aspiring young English lawyer named Thomas Babington Macaulay stood before the Parliament and presented an impassioned argument about the future role of British governance in India. Whereas in Europe, as Macaulay saw it, “The people are everywhere perfectly competent to hold some share, not in every country an equal share,…
The British treated Australia as terra nullius —as unowned land. Under British colonial law, aboriginal Australians had no property rights in the land, and colonization accordingly vested ownership of the entire continent in the British government. The doctrine of terra nullius remained the law in Australia throughout the colonial period, and indeed right up to…
In most studies of the early twentieth-century emergence of a modern conception of law in America, the formation of the American Law Institute in 1923 is not highlighted. One might point to academic literature advocating a “sociological” approach to judicial decision making, or a behavioralist approach to the work of judges, or the reorganization of…