Write in a clean editor, then format for Judgment and Decision Making in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Judgment and Decision Making is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Judgment and Decision Making 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Judgment and Decision Making has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment Behavioral Health and Interventions Economic and Environmental Valuation |
| ISSN | 1930-2975 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.72 |
| h-index | 101 |
| i10-index | 715 |
| Total citations | 46,759 |
| Open access | Yes |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Pennsylvania |
| Journal website | www.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Abstract Although Mechanical Turk has recently become popular among social scientists as a source of experimental data, doubts may linger about the quality of data provided by subjects recruited from online labor markets. We address these potential concerns by presenting new demographic data about the Mechanical Turk subject population, reviewing the strengths of Mechanical Turk…
Abstract Decision scientists have identified various plausible sources of ideological polarization over climate change, gun violence, national security, and like issues that turn on empirical evidence. This paper describes a study of three of them: the predominance of heuristic-driven information processing by members of the public; ideologically motivated reasoning; and the cognitive-style correlates of political…
Abstract Narrow self-interest is often used as a simplifying assumption when studying people making decisions in social contexts. Nonetheless, people exhibit a wide range of different motivations when choosing unilaterally among interdependent outcomes. Measuring the magnitude of the concern people have for others, sometimes called Social Value Orientation (SVO), has been an interest of many…
Abstract Across many real-world domains, men engage in more risky behaviors than do women. To examine some of the beliefs and preferences that underlie this difference, 657 participants assessed their likelihood of engaging in various risky activities relating to four different domains (gambling, health, recreation, and social), and reported their perceptions of (1) probability of…
Abstract Most people are caring and will exert great effort to rescue individual victims whose needy plight comes to their attention. These same good people, however, often become numbly indifferent to the plight of individuals who are “one of many” in a much greater problem. Why does this occur? The answer to this question will…
