Transitivity, mood and theme . Part I of this paper (sections 1–3) was an attempt to sketch some of the principal syntactic options, having the clause as point of origin, that are available to the speaker of English for the representation of processes and relations, and of objects, persons &c. as participants in them. The…
Journal of Linguistics Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Journal of Linguistics in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Journal of Linguistics format
Journal of Linguistics is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation, Linguistic Variation and Morphology, Phonetics and Phonology Research.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Journal of Linguistics 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Journal of Linguistics has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation Linguistic Variation and Morphology Phonetics and Phonology Research Natural Language Processing Techniques Linguistics and language evolution |
| ISSN | 0022-2267 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.49 |
| h-index | 123 |
| i10-index | 725 |
| Total citations | 60,940 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Edinburgh |
| Journal website | journals.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Journal of Linguistics per year
Citation impact of Journal of Linguistics by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Journal of Linguistics
This paper is concerned with the social mechanisms of linguistic change, and we begin by noting the distinction drawn by Bynon (1977) between two quite different approaches to the study of linguistic change. The first and more idealized, associated initially with traditional nineteenth century historical linguistics, involves the study of successive ‘states of the language’,…
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
This paper first provides an overview of the various senses in which the terms ‘marked’ and ‘unmarked’ have been used in 20th-century linguistics. Twelve different senses, related only by family resemblances, are distinguished, grouped into four larger classes: markedness as complexity, as difficulty, as abnormality, and as a multidimensional correlation. In the second part of…
The analysis of referring expressions can be divided into two branches for our purposes. The first includes theories of definite descriptions and proper names. The key to the riddle of the appropriate use of such expressions, it was thought, is the notion of presupposition: existence and/or uniqueness. Indeed, this was the question that dominated the…