Write in a clean editor, then format for International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, Quality and Safety in Healthcare.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy Quality and Safety in Healthcare Biomedical Ethics and Regulation Healthcare cost, quality, practices |
| ISSN | 0266-4623 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.56 |
| h-index | 101 |
| i10-index | 1,551 |
| Total citations | 75,957 |
| Open access | Yes |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of York |
| Journal website | journals.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Objectives: A systematic review of the effectiveness and costs of different guideline development, dissemination, and implementation strategies wasundertaken. The resource implications of these strategies was estimated, and a framework for deciding when it is efficient to develop and introduce clinical guidelines was developed.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) project is to develop a criteria list for assessment of the methodological quality of economic evaluations in systematic reviews. The criteria list resulting from this CHEC project should be regarded as a minimum standard. METHODS: The criteria list has been developed using a Delphi…
Utilities and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) are reviewed, with particular focus on their use in technology assessment. This article provides a broad overview and perspective on these two techniques and their interrelationship, with reference to other sources for details of implementation. The historical development, assumptions, strengths/weaknesses, and applications of each are summarized. Utilities are specifically…
The standard way to assess medical technologies is to conduct a randomized clinical trial. Patients are randomly assigned to groups receiving alternative treatments, and outcomes are monitored over a long period of time. For example, some victims of left main coronary artery disease may undergo coronary artery bypass surgery, and others may receive medical treatment…
OBJECTIVES: To analyze sources searched in Cochrane reviews, to determine the proportion of trials included in reviews that are indexed in major databases, and to compare the quality of these trials with those from other sources. METHODS: All new systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library, Issue1 2001, that were restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs)…
