Write in a clean editor, then format for Dialogue in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Dialogue is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Classical Philosophy and Thought, Philosophical Ethics and Theory, Philosophy and Theoretical Science.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Dialogue 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Dialogue has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Classical Philosophy and Thought Philosophical Ethics and Theory Philosophy and Theoretical Science Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Political Philosophy and Ethics |
| ISSN | 0012-2173 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.45 |
| h-index | 44 |
| i10-index | 223 |
| Total citations | 12,772 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Université de Montréal |
| Journal website | www.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. The German Text of Ludwig Wittgenstein's Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung with a new Translation by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness and with the Introduction by Bertrand Russell, F. R. S. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Canada: British Book Service. Pp. xxii + 166. $4.00. - Volume 1 Issue 2
John Earman's new book, World Enough and Space-Time (WEST) , is a brisk account of the controversy between space-time absolutists and relationists. The book is intended, one is told, to be “appropriate for use in an upper-level undergraduate or beginning graduate course in the philosophy of science” (p. xi), but Earman's no-holds-barred approach to the…
This book will be received ill-naturedly by those who think that a book with such a title ought, mainly anyway, to consist of critical exegesis of the work of its philosophical heroes and/or villains on the “central themes” which Professor Bennett selects for his attention. Such readers are likely to feel that when Bennett attributes…
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
