Write in a clean editor, then format for Business Ethics Quarterly in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Business Ethics Quarterly is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Ethics in Business and Education, Legal case studies and regulations, Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Business Ethics Quarterly has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Ethics in Business and Education Legal case studies and regulations Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Management and Organizational Studies Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment |
| ISSN | 1052-150X |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.49 |
| h-index | 129 |
| i10-index | 847 |
| Total citations | 73,532 |
| Top institutions publishing here | California University of Pennsylvania |
| Journal website | journals.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to enter the conversation about stakeholder theory with the goal of clarifying certain foundational issues. I want to show, along with Boatright, that there is no stakeholder paradox, and that the principle on which such a paradox is built, the Separation Thesis, is nicely self-serving to business and…
Abstract: In this article, I offer a proposal to clarify what I believe is the proper relation between value maximization and stakeholder theory, which I call enlightened value maximization. Enlightened value maximization utilizes much of the structure of stakeholder theory but accepts maximization of the long-run value of the firm as the criterion for making…
Abstract: The term stakeholder is a powerful one. This is due, to a significant degree, to its conceptual breadth. The term means different things to different people and hence evokes praise or scorn from a wide variety of scholars and practitioners. Such breadth of interpretation, though one of stakeholder theory’s greatest strengths, is also one…
Abstract: Extrapolating from Carroll’s four domains of corporate social responsibility (1979) and Pyramid of CSR (1991), an alternative approach to conceptualizing corporate social responsibility (CSR) is proposed. A three-domain approach is presented in which the three core domains of economic, legal, and ethical responsibilities are depicted in a Venn model framework. The Venn framework yields…
Abstract: This field survey focused on two constructs that have been developed to represent the ethical context in organizations: ethical climate and ethical culture. We first examined issues of convergence and divergence between these constructs through factor analysis and correlational analysis. Results suggested that the two constructs are measuring somewhat different, but strongly related dimensions…
