The author examines the sources and premises of the idea that free expression has value in part because of the function it performs in checking the abuse of official power (the “checking value”) and explores how this checking value difyers from those values that have dominated First Amendment analysis since 1919. In addition, the author…
American Bar Foundation Research Journal Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for American Bar Foundation Research Journal in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the American Bar Foundation Research Journal format
American Bar Foundation Research Journal is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Legal Education and Practice Innovations, Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems, Legal Systems and Judicial Processes.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — American Bar Foundation Research Journal has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Legal Education and Practice Innovations Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems Legal Systems and Judicial Processes Judicial and Constitutional Studies American Constitutional Law and Politics |
| ISSN | 0361-9486 |
| h-index | 29 |
| i10-index | 101 |
| Total citations | 3,698 |
| Top institutions publishing here | American Bar Foundation |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in American Bar Foundation Research Journal per year
Citation impact of American Bar Foundation Research Journal by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in American Bar Foundation Research Journal
The preponderance-of-the-evidence standard usually is understood to mean that the plaintiff must show that the probability that the defendant is in fact liable exceeds 1/2. Several commentators and at least one court have suggested that in some situations it may be preferable to make each defendant pay plaintiff's damages discounted by the probability that the…
The anecdotal literature suggests that the process of legal education impairs the maintenance of emotional well-being in law students. The purpose of this article is to present the results of a cross-sequential research design that empirically assessed the validity of this hypothesis. Data were collected, using four standardized self-report instruments (Brief Symptom Inventory, Beck Depression…
This paper sketches a new theoretical approach to the study of professions and uses that approach to analyze differences that have emerged between the American and English legal professions since the late nineteenth century. Earlier studies have generally emphasized professional structure and organization while ignoring work and its control. I argue that control of work…
Upon the enactment of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, published ethical norms will for the first time give explicit consideration to the lawyer's behavior in the process of negotiation. Rules 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 deal with negotiation. Although the Canons, the interpretations of the Canons, and the Disciplinary Rules and Ethical Considerations gave tangential…