Abstract. There is no auxiliary selection rule. ‘Have’ is identical to ‘be’ but for the incorporation of an abstract preposition (cf. Freeze (1992). The alternation is to be understood largely in terms of properties of the participial clause complement‐whether it is full or reduced, whether AGR‐S raises or not, whether Spec, AGR‐O is moved through…
Studia Linguistica Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Studia Linguistica in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Wiley template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Studia Linguistica format
Studia Linguistica is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley, covering Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation, Linguistic Variation and Morphology, Natural Language Processing Techniques.
| Publisher | Wiley |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Studia Linguistica 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Studia Linguistica style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation Linguistic Variation and Morphology Natural Language Processing Techniques Phonetics and Phonology Research Linguistics and language evolution |
| ISSN | 0039-3193 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.31 |
| h-index | 66 |
| i10-index | 285 |
| Total citations | 18,104 |
| Article processing charge | $2,630 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Lund University |
| Journal website | onlinelibrary.wiley.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Studia Linguistica per year
Citation impact of Studia Linguistica by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Studia Linguistica
Abstract. The paper considers several accounts of crosslinguistic variation regarding left branch extraction (LBE), focusing on adjectival LBE, and explores consequences of a proper analysis of LBE for the internal structure of NP. Two lines of research are pursued, both of which are based on the claim that languages that allow adjectival LBE do not…
It is argued that the dependence of Scandinavian Object Shift on verb movement, called Holmberg’s Generalization, is a special case of a more general condition preventing Object Shift across any phologically visible category within VP: a verb, a preposition, a verb particle or another argument. Overt movement of the blocking category will always pave the…
It is shown that postulating a Focus Phrase above vP enables us to explain such diverse phenomena as the Malayalam question word's position contiguous to V, the ‘remnant’ in English pseudogapping, the clause‐final ‘floated’ focus marker in English, and the position of the ‘cleft focus’ in English and Malayalam clefts. Assuming a Kaynean view of…