Taylor & Francis

Memory Template

Write in a clean editor, then format for Memory in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.

About the Memory format

Memory is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Memory Processes and Influences, Identity, Memory, and Therapy, Memory and Neural Mechanisms.

PublisherTaylor & Francis
Reference styleAuthor–year (Chicago, T&F)
Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text
Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Memory 12 (3): 45–58.

Formats any DOI in Memory style. No sign-up.

Publishes research inMemory Processes and Influences Identity, Memory, and Therapy Memory and Neural Mechanisms Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies Deception detection and forensic psychology
ISSN0965-8211
Citation impact (2-yr)1.52
h-index133
i10-index1,659
Total citations94,312
Top institutions publishing hereAarhus University
Journal websitewww.tandfonline.com
You getA submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit.

Papers published in Memory per year

114
2014
148
2015
111
2016
117
2017
158
2018
93
2019
126
2020
133
2021
87
2022
114
2023
128
2024
106
2025

Citation impact of Memory by publication year

3.5K
2014
3.3K
2015
2.5K
2016
2.5K
2017
2K
2018
1.5K
2019
1.4K
2020
1.8K
2021
679
2022
545
2023
333
2024
85
2025

Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.

Most-cited papers in Memory

The concurrent validity of the <i>N</i> -back task as a working memory measure

Susanne M. Jaeggi, Martin Buschkuehl, Walter J. Perrig et al. · 19 Apr 2010

The N-back task is used extensively in literature as a working memory (WM) paradigm and it is increasingly used as a measure of individual differences. However, not much is known about the psychometric properties of this task and the current study aims to shed more light on this issue. We first review the current literature…

The children's test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological working memory

Susan E. Gathercole, Catherine Willis, Alan Baddeley et al. · 1 Jun 1994

This article presents findings from the Children's Test of Nonword Repetition (CNRep). Normative data based on its administration to over 600 children aged between four and nine years are reported. Close developmental links are established between CNRep scores and vocabulary, reading, and comprehensive skills in children during the early school years. The links between nonword…

Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?

Jeffrey D. Karpicke, Andrew C. Butler, Henry L. Roediger · 1 Apr 2009

Basic research on human learning and memory has shown that practising retrieval of information (by testing the information) has powerful effects on learning and long-term retention. Repeated testing enhances learning more than repeated reading, which often confers limited benefit beyond that gained from the initial reading of the material. Laboratory research also suggests that students…

Levels of processing: Past, present... and future?

Fergus I. M. Craik · 1 Sep 2002

In this article I first briefly survey some enduring legacies of the Craik and Lockhart (1972) article on levels of processing (LOP) and address some common criticisms. In the next section I discuss whether memory can be regarded as "pure processing", the role of short-term memory in an LOP framework, measurement of "depth" in LOP,…

Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: A questionnaire study

Geoff Smith, Sergiola Del Sala, Robert H. Logie et al. · 1 Sep 2000

Frequency of prospective memory and retrospective memory failures was rated on a 16-item questionnaire by 862 volunteers, from five groups: patients with Alzheimer Disease (rated by carers), carers of Alzheimer Disease patients, elderly, young, and a group of married couples. Reported memory failures were highest for Alzheimer Disease patients, and lowest for carers, with elderly…

Memory template — frequently asked questions

How do I write a paper in the Memory format?
In DocuGuru you write your manuscript in a normal editor — no LaTeX setup required — and select the Memory template. When you export, DocuGuru compiles the paper into the official Taylor & Francis format and hands you a submission-ready PDF along with the editable LaTeX source.
What reference style does Memory use?
Memory uses Author–year (Chicago, T&F) references, shown as author–year markers such as (Smith, 2023) in the text. DocuGuru formats every in-text citation and the reference list in this exact style automatically. A reference appears like this: Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Memory 12 (3): 45–58.
Do I need to know LaTeX to submit to Memory?
No. DocuGuru generates the interact LaTeX class and compiles the PDF for you in the background, so you get a Taylor & Francis-ready Memory document without writing any LaTeX. If you do want it, the LaTeX source is included in the export.
Can I import an existing draft into the Memory template?
Yes. Paste or upload your current manuscript — Word, LaTeX, Markdown, or plain text — and DocuGuru reflows it into the Memory format with correct headings, figures, tables, and author–year citations.
Who publishes Memory?
Memory is a multidisciplinary journal published by Taylor & Francis. DocuGuru's Memory template matches Taylor & Francis's official submission format.
Can I export a submission-ready Memory PDF?
Yes — DocuGuru produces a PDF built with the official Memory template (the interact class) that is ready to submit to Taylor & Francis, together with the matching LaTeX source files.
How much does the Memory template cost?
You can start writing in the Memory template for free. Exporting the final submission-ready Memory PDF and LaTeX source is part of DocuGuru's paid plans — see the app for current pricing.
Use the Memory template