Write in a clean editor, then format for British Journal for the History of Mathematics in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
British Journal for the History of Mathematics is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering History and Theory of Mathematics, History of Science and Medicine, Historical Philosophy and Science.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." British Journal for the History of Mathematics 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in British Journal for the History of Mathematics style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | History and Theory of Mathematics History of Science and Medicine Historical Philosophy and Science History of Science and Natural History Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies |
| ISSN | 2637-5451 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.11 |
| h-index | 7 |
| i10-index | 5 |
| Total citations | 254 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Oxford |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
This paper suggests that layered ontology is important within Kepler’s method, and that it developed at least partially in response to a disciplinary and religious crisis. As such, and despite Platonic allegiances, it places him in a longue durée of geometrical constructivism in seventeenth-century Europe. After introducing the pivotal role of Mysterium cosmographicum (1596) and…
In late 1683, the physician and F.R.S. Martin Lister displayed to the Royal Society a new way of recording barometric observations, which amounted in all but name to the construction of line graphs. The innovation was communicated to the Oxford Philosophical Society, where Robert Plot used the method to display a year’s observations, published in…
Recent Leibniz scholarship has sought to gauge which foundational framework provides the most successful account of the procedures of the Leibnizian calculus (LC). While many scholars (e.g. Ishiguro, Levey) opt for a default Weierstrassian framework, Arthur compares LC to a non-Archimedean framework SIA (Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis) of Lawvere–Kock–Bell. We analyze Arthur's comparison and find it…
The objects shown in the exhibits or stored in the cabinets of museums and mathematics departments—or used in mathematical research and teaching—rarely convey a sense of crisis. However, crises create new roles, mix cultures, bring about new needs, make unexpected use of time (and sometimes free time from usual duties), and generate fear. All of…
The standard historical narrative regarding formalism during the twentieth century indicates the 1920s as a highpoint in the mathematical formalization project. This was marked by Hilbert’s statement that the sign stood at the beginning of pure mathematics [‘Neubegründung der Mathematik. Erste Mitteilung’, Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg, 1 (1922), 157–177]. If one…
