There are three components to boundary objects as outlined in the original 1989 article. Interpretive flexibility, the structure of informatic and work process needs and arrangements, and, finally, the dynamic between ill-structured and more tailored uses of the objects. Much of the use of the concept has concentrated on the aspect of interpretive flexibility and…
Science Technology & Human Values Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Science Technology & Human Values in one click — DocuGuru applies the official SAGE template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Science Technology & Human Values format
Science Technology & Human Values is a peer-reviewed journal published by SAGE, covering Climate Change Communication and Perception, Information Systems Theories and Implementation, Race, Genetics, and Society.
| Publisher | SAGE |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Harvard) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, A., Jones, B. and Lee, C. (2023) 'A representative article title', Science Technology & Human Values, 12(3), pp. 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Science Technology & Human Values style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Climate Change Communication and Perception Information Systems Theories and Implementation Race, Genetics, and Society Geographies of human-animal interactions Risk Perception and Management |
| ISSN | 0162-2439 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.6 |
| h-index | 128 |
| i10-index | 1,000 |
| Total citations | 81,493 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Amsterdam |
| Journal website | sth.sagepub.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Science Technology & Human Values per year
Citation impact of Science Technology & Human Values by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Science Technology & Human Values
There is a growing call for greater public involvement in establishing science and technology policy, in line with democratic ideals. A variety of public participation procedures exist that aim to consult and involve the public, ranging from the public hearing to the consensus conference. Unfortunately, a general lack of empirical consideration of the quality of…
Imprecise definition of key terms in the “public participation” domain have hindered the conduct of good research and militated against the development and implementation of effective participation practices. In this article, we define key concepts in the domain: public communication, public consultation, and public participation. These concepts are differentiated according to the nature and flow…
Discursive deference in the governance of science and technology is rebalancing from expert analysis toward participatory deliberation. Linear, scientistic conceptions of innovation are giving ground to more plural, socially situated understandings. Yet, growing recognition of social agency in technology choice is countered by persistently deterministic notions of technological progress. This article addresses this increasingly stark…
Scholarship in the social studies of science has argued convincingly that what demarcates science from nonscience is not some set of essential or transcendent characteristics or methods but rather an array of contingent circumstances and strategic behavior known as (Gieryn 1995, 1999). Although initially formulated to explain how scientists maintain the boundaries of their community…