Write in a clean editor, then format for Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics in one click — DocuGuru applies the official SAGE template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics is a peer-reviewed journal published by SAGE, covering Ethics in Clinical Research, Ethics in medical practice, Biomedical Ethics and Regulation.
| Publisher | SAGE |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Harvard) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, A., Jones, B. and Lee, C. (2023) 'A representative article title', Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(3), pp. 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Ethics in Clinical Research Ethics in medical practice Biomedical Ethics and Regulation Academic integrity and plagiarism Health Policy Implementation Science |
| ISSN | 1556-2646 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 2.03 |
| h-index | 61 |
| i10-index | 471 |
| Total citations | 18,935 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Johns Hopkins University |
| Journal website | www.sagepub.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
A SURVEY OF 750 UNIVERSITY HUMAN Research Ethics Boards (HRECs) in the United States revealed that Internet research protocols involving online or Web surveys are the type most often reviewed (94% of respondents), indicating the growing prevalence of this methodology for academic research. Respondents indicated that the electronic and online nature of these survey data…
Those concerned with protecting the Integrity of science generally focus on the serious but rare infractions of falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism (FFP). While the violations of FFP are clear threats to the quality of scientific work and public trust in science, are they the behaviors that researchers themselves find most troubling? Noticing that scientists seldom…
Two studies conducted through community-campus partnerships demonstrated emerging frameworks for ethical conduct of research involving Indigenous peoples in Canada. Both projects involved multiple Indigenous community partners whose interests in promoting children's development and fathers' involvement motivated the projects. The Indigenous projects were conceived within a broader social agenda of restorative justice and self-determination of Indigenous…
There is increasing evidence that scientific misconduct is more common than previously thought. Strong emphasis on scientific productivity may increase the sense of publication pressure. We administered a nationwide survey to Flemish biomedical scientists on whether they had engaged in scientific misconduct and whether they had experienced publication pressure. A total of 315 scientists participated…
NORMS OF BEHAVIOR IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH represent ideals to which most scientists subscribe. Our analysis of the extent of dissonance between these widely espoused ideals and scientists' perceptions of their own and others' behavior is based on survey responses from 3,247 mid- and early-career scientists who had research funding from the U.S. National Institutes of…
The American Review of Public Administration
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Work, Employment and Society
Autism
Communication Research
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine
