The concept of ‘‘certitude” ( yaqīn ) is central in Arabic discussions of the theory of demonstration advanced by Aristotle in the Posterior Analytics . In the Arabic tradition it is ‘‘certitude,” rather than ‘‘knowledge” ( ‘ilm =Greek epistēmē ), that is usually identified as the end sought by demonstrations. Al-Fārābī himself devotes a short…
Arabic Sciences and Philosophy Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Arabic Sciences and Philosophy in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Arabic Sciences and Philosophy format
Arabic Sciences and Philosophy is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Medieval and Classical Philosophy, Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies, Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Arabic Sciences and Philosophy has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Medieval and Classical Philosophy Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies Historical Astronomy and Related Studies Historical and Linguistic Studies |
| ISSN | 0957-4239 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.17 |
| h-index | 37 |
| i10-index | 113 |
| Total citations | 4,221 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique |
| Journal website | journals.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Arabic Sciences and Philosophy per year
Citation impact of Arabic Sciences and Philosophy by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Most scholars of Islamic intellectual history now agree on the distortedness of the traditional Western portrayal of al-Ġazālī (d. 1111) as the defender of Muslim orthodoxy whose Incoherence of the Philosophers ( Tahāfut al-falāsifa ) was such a powerful critique that it caused the annihilation of philosophical activity in Islamic civilization. Some in fact are…
Abstract The reception of Avicenna by medieval Jewish readers presents an underappreciated enigma. Despite the philosophical and scientific stature of Avicenna, his philosophical writings were relatively little studied in Jewish milieus, be it in Arabic or in Hebrew. In particular, Avicenna's philosophical writings are not among the “Hebräische Übersetzungen des Mittelalters” – only very few…
As for Avicenna the human soul is a complete substance which does not inhere in the body nor is imprinted in it, asserting its survival after the death of the body seems easy. Yet, he needs the body to explain its individuation. The paper analyzes Avicenna's arguments in the De anima sections, V, 3 &…
According to Tāj al-Dīn al-Subkī (d. 771 / 1370), al-Ghazālī (d. 505 / 1111) was the renewer ( mujaddid ) of the Muslim faith at the end of the 5th / 11th century, whereas al-Rāzī (d. 606 /1210) was the renewer of faith at the end of the 6th / 12th century. That al-Ghazālī deserves…