Write in a clean editor, then format for Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Wiley template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley, covering Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Health Policy Implementation Science, Delphi Technique in Research.
| Publisher | Wiley |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Health Policy Implementation Science Delphi Technique in Research Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Human auditory perception and evaluation |
| ISSN | 2832-9023 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 3.03 |
| h-index | 13 |
| i10-index | 19 |
| Total citations | 693 |
| Open access | Yes |
| Top institutions publishing here | Cochrane |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Background: Given the colonial connotations of the term "stakeholder", its continued use may be perceived as disrespectful to Indigenous Peoples. While several groups have introduced alternative terms, each has its own limitations. The objective of this article is to introduce "interest-holders" as an alternative term to "stakeholders" and describe the discussions underpinning the adoption of…
This tutorial focuses on standardized mean differences (SMD) as effect measures in meta-analyses. We will explain what they are, when they should be used, how to correctly compute and interpret them, and some of the most common error made within evidence synthesis.
This tutorial focuses on multiarm studies. We will explain what multiarm studies are and how to include data from them in a meta-analysis.
Introduction: RoB 2 is a tool used by systematic reviewers to assess risk of bias in randomized trials. Over a period of 19 months working as editors for Cochrane, we saw many instances where users of RoB 2 frequently applied the tool in ways the developers had not intended, despite availability of detailed guidance, webinars…
Abstract Introduction Qualitative evidence is increasingly incorporated into decision‐making processes. Assessing the methodological limitations of primary studies is critical to making an overall assessment of confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (QES) using GRADE‐CERQual. Current critical appraisal tools were not developed specifically for use in Cochrane reviews or GRADE‐CERQual, and few are evidence‐based. The…
