Population genetic databases (“biobanks”) raise tricky dilemmas over the issue of consent. This paper addresses the question of whether moving away from traditional, informed consent to a “blanket consent” regime for participation in large-scale biobanks is legally and ethically justifiable. First, it describes the biobanking context and the emerging dilemmas around consent. Then, it identifies…
King s Law Journal Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for King s Law Journal in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the King s Law Journal format
King s Law Journal is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Legal principles and applications, Judicial and Constitutional Studies, European and International Law Studies.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." King s Law Journal 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in King s Law Journal style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Legal principles and applications Judicial and Constitutional Studies European and International Law Studies Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction European and International Contract Law |
| ISSN | 0961-5768 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.27 |
| h-index | 26 |
| i10-index | 76 |
| Total citations | 2,814 |
| Top institutions publishing here | King's College London |
| Journal website | www.hartjournals.co.uk |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in King s Law Journal per year
Citation impact of King s Law Journal by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in King s Law Journal
In 2018 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warned that humanity \nhas 12 years to take radical action to avert an eco-catastrophe. Accordingly, there \nremains a brief window of opportunity within which to act, and to do so with such \nforce, commitment and ambition as to transform the global economy radically and \nrapidly from high to net zero…
Part of the Pandora’s Box of unique changes humans have wreaked upon our environment with industrialisation, which has brought about the Anthropocene, is the unleashing of chemicals that harm human...
(2004). The Cult of Consent: Fixation and Fallacy. King's Law Journal: Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 223-251.