Abstract A variety of ethical objections have been raised against the military employment of uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs, drones). Some of these objections are technological concerns over UAVs abilities' to function on par with their inhabited counterparts. This paper sets such concerns aside and instead focuses on supposed objections to the use of UAVs in…
Journal of Military Ethics Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Journal of Military Ethics in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Journal of Military Ethics format
Journal of Military Ethics is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering War, Ethics, and Justification, Torture, Ethics, and Law, Global Peace and Security Dynamics.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Journal of Military Ethics 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Journal of Military Ethics style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | War, Ethics, and Justification Torture, Ethics, and Law Global Peace and Security Dynamics Military History and Strategy International Law and Human Rights |
| ISSN | 1502-7570 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.8 |
| h-index | 39 |
| i10-index | 199 |
| Total citations | 7,765 |
| Top institutions publishing here | United States Naval Academy |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Journal of Military Ethics per year
Citation impact of Journal of Military Ethics by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Journal of Military Ethics
Abstract The underlying thesis of the research in ethical autonomy for lethal autonomous unmanned systems is that they will potentially be capable of performing more ethically on the battlefield than are human soldiers. In this article this hypothesis is supported by ongoing and foreseen technological advances and perhaps equally important by an assessment of the…
Abstract Plans to automate killing by using robots armed with lethal weapons have been a prominent feature of most US military forces’ roadmaps since 2004. The idea is to have a staged move from ‘man-in-the-loop’ to ‘man-on-the-loop’ to full autonomy. While this may result in considerable military advantages, the policy raises ethical concerns with regard…
The present debate over the creation and potential deployment of lethal autonomous weapons, or ‘killer robots’, is garnering more and more attention. Much of the argument revolves around whether such machines would be able to uphold the principle of noncombatant immunity. However, much of the present debate fails to take into consideration the practical realties…
The present paper is devoted to a detailed presentation of a new Military Ethics doctrine of fighting terror. It is proposed as an extension of the classical Just War Theory, which has been meant to apply to ordinary international conflicts. Since the conditions of a fight against terror are essentially different from the conditions that…