Taylor & Francis

Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology Template

Write in a clean editor, then format for Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.

About the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format

Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Heavy metals in environment, Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact.

PublisherTaylor & Francis
Reference styleAuthor–year (Chicago, T&F)
Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text
Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 12 (3): 45–58.

Formats any DOI in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology style. No sign-up.

Publishes research inPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts Heavy metals in environment Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
ISSN1064-3389
Citation impact (2-yr)12.06
h-index189
i10-index1,129
Total citations147,337
Top institutions publishing hereChinese Academy of Sciences
Journal websitewww.tandfonline.com
You getA submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit.

Papers published in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology per year

49
2014
44
2015
34
2016
53
2017
37
2018
106
2019
118
2020
82
2021
69
2022
82
2023
67
2024
60
2025

Citation impact of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology by publication year

9.6K
2014
7.4K
2015
2.8K
2016
6.7K
2017
4.7K
2018
12.4K
2019
11.6K
2020
5.4K
2021
4.5K
2022
3.5K
2023
1.3K
2024
452
2025

Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.

Most-cited papers in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology

Advanced Oxidation Processes for Organic Contaminant Destruction Based on the Fenton Reaction and Related Chemistry

Joseph J. Pignatello, Esther Oliveros, Allison A. MacKay · 1 Jan 2006

Fenton chemistry encompasses reactions of hydrogen peroxide in the presence of iron to generate highly reactive species such as the hydroxyl radical and possibly others. In this review, the complex mechanisms of Fenton and Fenton-like reactions and the important factors influencing these reactions, from both a fundamental and practical perspective, in applications to water and…

4,019 citations Cite SaveGo to paper →
Present and Long-Term Composition of MSW Landfill Leachate: A Review

Peter Kjeldsen, Morton A. Barlaz, Alix P. Rooker et al. · 1 Oct 2002

The major potential environmental impacts related to landfill leachate are pollution of groundwater and surface waters. Landfill leachate contains pollutants that can be categorized into four groups (dissolved organic matter, inorganic macrocomponents, heavy metals, and xenobiotic organic compounds). Existing data show high leachate concentrations of all components in the early acid phase due to strong…

2,482 citations Cite SaveGo to paper →
Advanced Oxidation Processes in Water/Wastewater Treatment: Principles and Applications. A Review

Mehmet A. Oturan, Jean‐Jacques Aaron · 25 Feb 2014

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) constitute important, promising, efficient, and environmental-friendly methods developed to principally remove persistent organic pollutants (POPs) from waters and wastewaters. Generally, AOPs are based on the in situ generation of a powerful oxidizing agent, such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH), obtained at a sufficient concentration to effectively decontaminate waters. This critical review presents…

2,198 citations Cite SaveGo to paper →
Mercury in the Aquatic Environment: A Review of Factors Affecting Methylation

Susanne M. Ullrich, T.W. Tanton, S.A. Abdrashitova · 1 Jul 2001

Mercury is one of the most hazardous contaminants that may be present in the aquatic environment, but its ecological and toxicological effects are strongly dependent on the chemical species present. Species distribution and transformation processes in natural aquatic systems are controlled by various physical, chemical, and biological factors. Depending on the prevailing environmental conditions, inorganic…

1,657 citations Cite SaveGo to paper →
Advanced Oxidation Processes for Wastewater Treatment: Formation of Hydroxyl Radical and Application

Jian Long Wang, LE JIN XU · 2 Dec 2011

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), defined as those technologies that utilize the hydroxyl radical (·OH) for oxidation, have received increasing attention in the research and development of wastewater treatment technologies in the last decades. These processes have been applied successfully for the removal or degradation of toxic pollutants or used as pretreatment to convert recalcitrant pollutants…

1,563 citations Cite SaveGo to paper →

Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology template — frequently asked questions

How do I write a paper in the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format?
In DocuGuru you write your manuscript in a normal editor — no LaTeX setup required — and select the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology template. When you export, DocuGuru compiles the paper into the official Taylor & Francis format and hands you a submission-ready PDF along with the editable LaTeX source.
What reference style does Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology use?
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology uses Author–year (Chicago, T&F) references, shown as author–year markers such as (Smith, 2023) in the text. DocuGuru formats every in-text citation and the reference list in this exact style automatically. A reference appears like this: Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 12 (3): 45–58.
Do I need to know LaTeX to submit to Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology?
No. DocuGuru generates the interact LaTeX class and compiles the PDF for you in the background, so you get a Taylor & Francis-ready Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology document without writing any LaTeX. If you do want it, the LaTeX source is included in the export.
Can I import an existing draft into the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology template?
Yes. Paste or upload your current manuscript — Word, LaTeX, Markdown, or plain text — and DocuGuru reflows it into the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format with correct headings, figures, tables, and author–year citations.
Who publishes Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology?
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology is a multidisciplinary journal published by Taylor & Francis. DocuGuru's Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology template matches Taylor & Francis's official submission format.
Can I export a submission-ready Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology PDF?
Yes — DocuGuru produces a PDF built with the official Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology template (the interact class) that is ready to submit to Taylor & Francis, together with the matching LaTeX source files.
How much does the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology template cost?
You can start writing in the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology template for free. Exporting the final submission-ready Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology PDF and LaTeX source is part of DocuGuru's paid plans — see the app for current pricing.
Use the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology template