Much contemporary social epistemology takes as its starting point individuals with sophisticated propositional attitudes and considers (i) how those individuals depend on each other to gain (or lose) knowledge through testimony, disagreement, and the like and (ii) if, in addition to individual knowers, it is possible for groups to have knowledge. In this paper I…
Australasian Philosophical Review Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Australasian Philosophical Review in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Australasian Philosophical Review format
Australasian Philosophical Review is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics, Philosophy and Theoretical Science, Philosophical Ethics and Theory.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Australasian Philosophical Review 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Australasian Philosophical Review style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy and Theoretical Science Philosophical Ethics and Theory Political Philosophy and Ethics Philosophy and History of Science |
| ISSN | 2474-0500 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 2.21 |
| h-index | 19 |
| i10-index | 52 |
| Total citations | 1,984 |
| Top institutions publishing here | The University of Sydney |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Australasian Philosophical Review per year
Citation impact of Australasian Philosophical Review by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Australasian Philosophical Review
There are two kinds of forgiveness that appear as radically different from one another: one presents forgiveness as essentially earned through remorseful apology; the other presents it as fundamentally non-earned—a gift. The first, which I label Moral Justice Forgiveness, adopts a stance of moral demand and conditionality; the second, which I label Gifted Forgiveness, adopts…
This paper presents a new account of the pleasure we take in art. It distinguishes first between two types of pleasure. Relief or r-pleasure is transient and marks the end of a state that is difficult to maintain. Facilitation or f-pleasure accompanies an activity and lasts as long as the activity does. It motivates this…
Resistance to the idea that phenomenology can be relevant to cognitive scientific explanation has faced two objections advanced, respectively, from both sides of the issue: from the scientific perspective it has been suggested that phenomenology, understood as an account of first-person experience, is ultimately reducible to cognitive neuroscientific explanation; and from a phenomenological perspective it…
In a democracy what people think matters. Political philosophers are mostly democrats. They often justify deliberative and participatory democracy. And yet when it comes to philosophizing they often turn a blind eye to what people think; they sometimes even express profound doubts about what people think and about consulting the public. I call this the…