(2008). Critical Thinking: Why Is It So Hard to Teach? Arts Education Policy Review: Vol. 109, No. 4, pp. 21-32.
847 citations
Cite
SaveGo to paper →
Taylor & Francis
Arts Education Policy Review Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Arts Education Policy Review in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Arts Education Policy Review format
Arts Education Policy Review is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Diverse Music Education Insights, Art Education and Development, Cultural Industries and Urban Development.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Arts Education Policy Review 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Arts Education Policy Review style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Diverse Music Education Insights Art Education and Development Cultural Industries and Urban Development Teacher Education and Leadership Studies Creativity in Education and Neuroscience |
| ISSN | 1063-2913 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.91 |
| h-index | 51 |
| i10-index | 344 |
| Total citations | 13,967 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Arts Education Policy Review per year
Citation impact of Arts Education Policy Review by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Arts Education Policy Review
(1998). Does Experience in the Arts Boost Academic Achievement? Arts Education Policy Review: Vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 32-40.
279 citations
Cite
SaveGo to paper →
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Additional informationNotes on contributorsLois Hetland Lois Hetland is project manager for REAP at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Ellen Winner is principal investigator for REAP at Boston College and Harvard Graduate School of Education.
276 citations
Cite
SaveGo to paper →
(1995). The Subservient, Co-Equal, Affective, and Social Integration Styles and their Implications for the Arts. Arts Education Policy Review: Vol. 96, No. 5, pp. 31-37.
218 citations
Cite
SaveGo to paper →
Abstract Individual creativity is ubiquitous. New technologies both enable and urge fresh approaches to creativity in the context of education. University-level education offers a natural place to adjust pedagogical structures in favor of a more individual approach to learning that organizes the intellectual community into new patters of interaction and time allocation. This direction is…
179 citations
Cite
SaveGo to paper →
Related journal templates
Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications
Philosophical Magazine
Quantitative Finance
Road Materials and Pavement Design
Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes
The American Mathematical Monthly
The Journal of Development Studies
Arts Education Policy Review template — frequently asked questions
How do I write a paper in the Arts Education Policy Review format?
In DocuGuru you write your manuscript in a normal editor — no LaTeX setup required — and select the Arts Education Policy Review template. When you export, DocuGuru compiles the paper into the official Taylor & Francis format and hands you a submission-ready PDF along with the editable LaTeX source.
What reference style does Arts Education Policy Review use?
Arts Education Policy Review uses Author–year (Chicago, T&F) references, shown as author–year markers such as (Smith, 2023) in the text. DocuGuru formats every in-text citation and the reference list in this exact style automatically. A reference appears like this: Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Arts Education Policy Review 12 (3): 45–58.
Do I need to know LaTeX to submit to Arts Education Policy Review?
No. DocuGuru generates the interact LaTeX class and compiles the PDF for you in the background, so you get a Taylor & Francis-ready Arts Education Policy Review document without writing any LaTeX. If you do want it, the LaTeX source is included in the export.
Can I import an existing draft into the Arts Education Policy Review template?
Yes. Paste or upload your current manuscript — Word, LaTeX, Markdown, or plain text — and DocuGuru reflows it into the Arts Education Policy Review format with correct headings, figures, tables, and author–year citations.
Who publishes Arts Education Policy Review?
Arts Education Policy Review is a multidisciplinary journal published by Taylor & Francis. DocuGuru's Arts Education Policy Review template matches Taylor & Francis's official submission format.
Can I export a submission-ready Arts Education Policy Review PDF?
Yes — DocuGuru produces a PDF built with the official Arts Education Policy Review template (the interact class) that is ready to submit to Taylor & Francis, together with the matching LaTeX source files.
How much does the Arts Education Policy Review template cost?
You can start writing in the Arts Education Policy Review template for free. Exporting the final submission-ready Arts Education Policy Review PDF and LaTeX source is part of DocuGuru's paid plans — see the app for current pricing.