Argument spheres are symbolic constructions that shape the expectations of interlocutors who engage in the activities of theoretical and practical reasoning. These communicative contexts offer a range of taken-for-granted-as-reasonable rules, norms, procedures and styles of engagement. These grounds may appear stable, even natural, yet their relationships and boundary conditions become contested through controversy. Such struggles…
Argumentation and Advocacy Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Argumentation and Advocacy in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Argumentation and Advocacy format
Argumentation and Advocacy is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Rhetoric and Communication Studies, Discourse Analysis in Language Studies, Social Media and Politics.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Argumentation and Advocacy 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Argumentation and Advocacy style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Rhetoric and Communication Studies Discourse Analysis in Language Studies Social Media and Politics Language, Metaphor, and Cognition Communication in Education and Healthcare |
| ISSN | 1051-1431 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.93 |
| h-index | 43 |
| i10-index | 250 |
| Total citations | 9,276 |
| Top institutions publishing here | National Communication Association |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Argumentation and Advocacy per year
Citation impact of Argumentation and Advocacy by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Argumentation and Advocacy
Students of argumentation rarely acknowledge that the term “argument” has two importantly different senses. This essay attempts to show the importance of distinguishing these senses, taking as a focus for analysis Wayne Brockriede's recent discussions of the concept of argument. It is argued that Brackriede's view suffers from a failure to heed the distinction noted,…
This essay advocates the necessity of considering the body when attempting to understand the effects of many forms of public argument, especially social protest rhetoric. Close readings of the unruly acts of Earth First!, ACT UP, and Queer Nation, make evident that both the meaning and force of their arguments is dependent on the deployment…
AbstractThis study responds to The Racine Group's (2002) call for campaign debate research that explores "the trans-campaign effects of debates on such matters as voting behavior, image formation, and attitude change" (p. 199). Our analysis of debate effects from 2000 to 2012 provides a number of important insights into how presidential campaign debates function in…
(2007). Outlines of a Theory of Visual Argument. Argumentation and Advocacy: Vol. 43, Special Issue on Visual Argumentation, pp. 103-113.