Write in a clean editor, then format for Research Evaluation in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Oxford University Press template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Research Evaluation is a peer-reviewed journal published by Oxford University Press, covering scientometrics and bibliometrics research, Innovation Policy and R&D, Evaluation and Performance Assessment.
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (OUP) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, A., Jones, B. and Lee, C. (2023) 'A representative article title', Research Evaluation, 12(3), pp. 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Research Evaluation has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | scientometrics and bibliometrics research Innovation Policy and R&D Evaluation and Performance Assessment Health and Medical Research Impacts Higher Education Governance and Development |
| ISSN | 0958-2029 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 2.84 |
| h-index | 84 |
| i10-index | 565 |
| Total citations | 30,053 |
| Article processing charge | $3,032 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Leiden University |
| Journal website | rev.oxfordjournals.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
This article aims to explore what is understood by the term 'research impact' and to provide a comprehensive assimilation of available literature and information, drawing on global experiences to understand the potential for methods and frameworks of impact assessment being implemented for UK impact assessment. We take a more focused look at the impact component…
Social impact of research is difficult to measure. Attribution problems arise because of the often long time-lag between research and a particular impact, and because impacts are the consequences of multiple causes. Furthermore, there is a lack of robust measuring instruments. We aim to overcome these problems through a different approach to evaluation where learning…
Highly cited articles are very different from ‘ordinary’ cited articles. Typically, they are authored by a large number of scientists, often involving international collaboration. The majority of the papers represent regular journal articles (81%), although review articles (12%) are over-represented compared to the national average. The citation curves of highly cited papers follow a typical…
In pursuit of public accountability, the mechanisms for assessing research performance have become more complicated and burdensome. In the United Kingdom, the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) evolved from an initially simple framework to something much more complex and onerous. As the RAE now gives way to the Research Excellence Framework (REF), 'impact assessment' is being…
This review of the international literature on evaluation systems, evaluation practices, and metrics (mis)uses was written as part of a larger review commissioned by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) to inform their independent assessment of the role of metrics in research evaluation (2014–5). The literature on evaluation systems, practices, and effects of…
