Write in a clean editor, then format for International Journal of Constitutional Law in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Oxford University Press template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
International Journal of Constitutional Law is a peer-reviewed journal published by Oxford University Press, covering Judicial and Constitutional Studies, European and International Law Studies, International Law and Human Rights.
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (OUP) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, A., Jones, B. and Lee, C. (2023) 'A representative article title', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(3), pp. 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — International Journal of Constitutional Law has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Judicial and Constitutional Studies European and International Law Studies International Law and Human Rights American Constitutional Law and Politics Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies |
| ISSN | 1474-2640 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.51 |
| h-index | 72 |
| i10-index | 548 |
| Total citations | 25,450 |
| Article processing charge | $3,278 |
| Top institutions publishing here | New York University |
| Journal website | academic.oup.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Immigration Law—China Sovereignty over Hong Kong—Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong decides latest right of abode case, which settles the constitutional controversies over the rights of children born on mainland China to join parents resident in Hong Kong.—Ng Siu Tung v. Director of Immigration.
The concept of vulnerable groups is gaining momentum in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The Court has so far used it in cases concerning Roma, people with mental disabilities, people living with HIV, and asylum seekers. Yet the appearance of the vulnerable-group concept in the Court’s legal reasoning has so…
1Carolyn S. G. Munro Professor of Political Science and Senior Fellow, The Hoover Institution, at Stanford University and Visiting Professor at New York University School of Law 2Research Director, CNRS, France, and Visiting Professor of Politics and Law and New York University
Balancing is the main method used by a number of constitutional courts around the world to resolve conflicts of fundamental rights. The European Court of Human Rights routinely balances human rights against each other and against conflicting public interests; it has elevated proportionality to the status of a basic principle of interpretation of the European…
