Recent groundbreaking legislation created new immigration relief for of human trafficking, who would otherwise be subject to deportation after escape from exploitation. However, few trafficking have successfully obtained relief under its provisions. Existing critique has focused on international and domestic definitions of human trafficking and appraisal of the statutory language. This Article explores the problem…
Boston University law review Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Boston University law review in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Oxford University Press template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Boston University law review format
Boston University law review is a peer-reviewed journal published by Oxford University Press, covering Legal Systems and Judicial Processes, Legal and Constitutional Studies, Law, Rights, and Freedoms.
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (OUP) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, A., Jones, B. and Lee, C. (2023) 'A representative article title', Boston University law review, 12(3), pp. 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Boston University law review has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Legal Systems and Judicial Processes Legal and Constitutional Studies Law, Rights, and Freedoms American Constitutional Law and Politics Legal principles and applications |
| ISSN | 0006-8047 |
| h-index | 17 |
| i10-index | 27 |
| Total citations | 1,275 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Boston College |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Boston University law review per year
Citation impact of Boston University law review by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Boston University law review
Despite the U.S. public's tolerance of and emotional attachment to avoidance at the individual level, the avoidance practices of modern multinational corporations such as Google, Amazon, Apple, and Starbucks recently have received heavy criticism in the media. This Note argues that the doctrine of corporate social responsibility provides a logical rationale for multinational corporations to…