Write in a clean editor, then format for Cambridge Historical Journal in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Cambridge Historical Journal is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies, Historical Economic and Social Studies, Educational Robotics and Engineering.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Cambridge Historical Journal 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Cambridge Historical Journal has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Historical Economic and Social Studies Educational Robotics and Engineering American Constitutional Law and Politics Medieval Literature and History |
| ISSN | 1474-6913 |
| h-index | 25 |
| i10-index | 56 |
| Total citations | 1,955 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Cambridge |
| Journal website | journals.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
In the first great age of English scholarship, to write history was to write polemics. England was a legal, not a geographical expression; to write her history was to interpret her law, or the relation of that law to the Crown, and so to take sides in the battle of parties. The law was timeless;…
The literary tradition about the makers of early written codes in Greece presents so many contradictions and inconsistencies that it is natural to take refuge in complete scepticism. But if the tradition is analysed, it appears that there are two strata, the first reasonably consistent, matter-of-fact and credible, the second progressively vitiated by influences which…
The Exclusion Controversy of 1679–81 echoes many of the constitutional issues debated before and during the Civil War, just as it anticipates many of the arguments used to support the 1688 Revolution. If the attempt to exclude James, Duke of York, from the succession to the throne was abortive, it still provides an important key…
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
No description of the theory of the constitution which the Whigs Professed in the five years of their existence as a political party in Charles II's reign, can be adequately made except in relation to the position in which they found themselves during this period. For though their view of what the constitution ought to…
