Write in a clean editor, then format for Research Involvement and Engagement in one click — DocuGuru applies the official BMC (BioMed Central) template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Research Involvement and Engagement is a peer-reviewed journal published by BMC (BioMed Central), covering Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Health Policy Implementation Science, Participatory Visual Research Methods. Over its lifetime it has published 933 papers, which have received 21,338 citations.
| Publisher | BMC (BioMed Central) |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered (Vancouver) Numbered — [1], [2] in the text 1. Smith A, Jones B, Lee C. A representative article title. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2023;12(3):45–58.
Formats any DOI in Research Involvement and Engagement style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Mental Health and Patient Involvement Health Policy Implementation Science Participatory Visual Research Methods Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare Ethics in Clinical Research |
| ISSN | 2056-7529 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 3.24 |
| h-index | 67 |
| i10-index | 434 |
| Article processing charge | $1,925 |
| Open access | Yes — indexed in DOAJ |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Toronto |
| Journal website | link.springer.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
While the patient and public involvement (PPI) evidence base has expanded over the past decade, the quality of reporting within papers is often inconsistent, limiting our understanding of how it works, in what context, for whom, and why. To develop international consensus on the key items to report to enhance the quality, transparency, and consistency…
Background: Society has to cope with a large burden of health issues. There is need to find solutions to prevent diseases and help individuals live healthier lifestyles. Individual needs and circumstances vary greatly and one size fit all solutions do not tend to work well. More tailored solutions centred on individuals’ needs and circumstances can…
Much of the current debate around the impact of patient/public involvement on research focuses on the lack of empirical data. While a number of systematic literature reviews have reported the various ways in which involvement makes a difference to research and the people involved, this evidence has been criticised as being weak and anecdotal. It…
There is some evidence that there is a mismatch between what patients and health professionals want to see researched and the research that is actually done. The James Lind Alliance (JLA) research Priority Setting Partnerships (PSPs) were created to address this mismatch. Between 2007 and 2014, JLA partnerships of patients, carers and health professionals agreed…
Background Continual improvements to health systems, products, and services are necessary for improvements in health. However, many of these improvements are not incorporated into everyday practice. When designing new health systems, products, and services, involving members of the healthcare community and the public with personal healthcare experience can help to make sure that improvements will…
