ACM SIGCSE Bulletin Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for ACM SIGCSE Bulletin in one click — DocuGuru applies the official ACM template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the ACM SIGCSE Bulletin format
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin is a peer-reviewed journal published by ACM, covering Teaching and Learning Programming, Experimental Learning in Engineering, Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development.
| Publisher | ACM |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered (ACM) Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] Ada Smith, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. A representative article title. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 12, 3, Article 45 (2023).
Formats any DOI in ACM SIGCSE Bulletin style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Teaching and Learning Programming Experimental Learning in Engineering Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development Software Engineering Research Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems |
| ISSN | 0097-8418 |
| h-index | 85 |
| i10-index | 1,168 |
| Total citations | 53,856 |
| Top institutions publishing here | The University of Texas at Austin |
| Journal website | books.google.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in ACM SIGCSE Bulletin per year
Citation impact of ACM SIGCSE Bulletin by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
Visualization technology can be used to graphically illustrate various concepts in computer science. We argue that such technology, no matter how well it is designed, is of little educational value unless it engages learners in an active learning activity. Drawing on a review of experimental studies of visualization effectiveness, we motivate this position against the…
It is a common conception that CS1 is a very difficult course and that failure rates are high. However, until now there has only been anecdotal evidence for this claim. This article reports on a survey among institutions around the world regarding failure rates in introductory programming courses. The article describes the design of the…
Can we turn novices into experts in a four year undergraduate program? If so, how? If not, what is the best we can do? While every teacher has his/her own opinion on these questions, psychological studies over the last twenty years have started to furnish scientific answers. Unfortunately, little of these results have been incorporated…
A study by a ITiCSE 2001 working group ("the McCracken Group") established that many students do not know how to program at the conclusion of their introductory courses. A popular explanation for this incapacity is that the students lack the ability to problem-solve. That is, they lack the ability to take a problem description, decompose…