Write in a clean editor, then format for New Directions for Program Evaluation in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Wiley template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
New Directions for Program Evaluation is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley, covering Evaluation and Performance Assessment, Educational Assessment and Improvement, Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation.
| Publisher | Wiley |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." New Directions for Program Evaluation 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in New Directions for Program Evaluation style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Evaluation and Performance Assessment Educational Assessment and Improvement Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation Health Policy Implementation Science Community Health and Development |
| ISSN | 0164-7989 |
| h-index | 40 |
| i10-index | 172 |
| Total citations | 12,590 |
| Top institutions publishing here | United States Government Accountability Office |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Abstract The emergence of a new paradigm of inquiry (naturalistic) has, unsurprisingly enough, led to a demand for rigorous criteria that meet traditional standards of inquiry. Two sets are suggested, one of which, the “trustworthiness” criteria, parallels conventional criteria, while the second, “authenticity” criteria, is implied directly by new paradigm assumptions.
Abstract This chapter points out serious shortcomings in DEA's treatment of price efficiency, illustrates the dangers of misspecification errors in DEA, and suggests extentions of the basic DEA formulation that address these shortcomings.
Abstract The role of theory in program evaluation is an important but neglected area in evaluation practice and theory. Program theory has several important functions that can improve our ability to generalize from particular evaluations, contribute to social science theory, and achieve consensus in evaluation planning.
Abstract The use of qualitative measures in a quantitative framework results in a reasonable likelihood of triangulation; in contrast, the independent conduct of qualitative and quantitative evaluations is a greater challenge for triangulation, but it also holds promise for greater discovery.
