Journal of Social Philosophy Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Journal of Social Philosophy in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Wiley template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Journal of Social Philosophy format
Journal of Social Philosophy is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley, covering Political Philosophy and Ethics, Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies, Philosophical Ethics and Theory.
| Publisher | Wiley |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Journal of Social Philosophy 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Journal of Social Philosophy style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Political Philosophy and Ethics Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies Philosophical Ethics and Theory Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Critical Theory and Philosophy |
| ISSN | 0047-2786 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.45 |
| h-index | 65 |
| i10-index | 460 |
| Total citations | 20,043 |
| Article processing charge | $3,040 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Oslo |
| Journal website | onlinelibrary.wiley.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Journal of Social Philosophy per year
Citation impact of Journal of Social Philosophy by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Journal of Social Philosophy
The evaluation of labour markets and of particular jobs ought to be sensitive to a plurality of benefits and burdens of work. We use the term 'the goods of work' to refer to those benefits of work that cannot be obtained in exchange for money and that can be enjoyed mostly or exclusively in the…
Philosophers who have written about implicit bias have claimed or implied that individuals are not responsible, and therefore not blameworthy, for their implicit biases, and that this is a function of the nature of implicit bias as implicit: below the radar of conscious reflection, out of the control of the deliberating agent, and not rationally…