Abstract Structure from motion (SFM) algorithms are known for their ability to reconstruct a sparse point cloud of scenes that were imaged by a series of overlapping photographs. When complemented by stereo‐matching algorithms, detailed three‐dimensional models can be built from such photograph collections in a fully automated way. Since 2010, a computer vision software package…
Archaeological Prospection Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Archaeological Prospection in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Wiley template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Archaeological Prospection format
Archaeological Prospection is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley, covering Geophysical Methods and Applications, Archaeological Research and Protection, Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods.
| Publisher | Wiley |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Archaeological Prospection 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Archaeological Prospection style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Geophysical Methods and Applications Archaeological Research and Protection Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods Seismic Waves and Analysis Archaeology and ancient environmental studies |
| ISSN | 1075-2196 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.66 |
| h-index | 55 |
| i10-index | 451 |
| Total citations | 16,509 |
| Article processing charge | $3,610 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique |
| Journal website | onlinelibrary.wiley.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Archaeological Prospection per year
Citation impact of Archaeological Prospection by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Archaeological Prospection
Abstract Local relief models (LRM) are proposed as a new tool for archaeological prospection. A data processing approach is presented which produces LRM from LiDAR‐derived high‐resolution digital elevation models (DEMs). The LRM represents local, small‐scale elevation differences after removing the large‐scale landscape forms from the data. The LRM greatly enhances the visibility of small‐scale, shallow…
Abstract In addition to traditional platforms for low‐level remote sensing (balloons, kites, etc.) new and more complex automated systems [unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or drones] have become available in the last decade. The success and market expansion of these platforms has been a driving force in the development of active and passive sensors specifically designed…
Abstract This article gives an overview of the various aspects of ground‐penetrating radar as used in archaeology. After a short overview of the historical development of the technique, the most important physical parameters and principles are explained. This includes relative dielectric constant, conductivity, attenuation, horizontal and vertical resolution, wavelength and footprint. The focus is on…
Time slices of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data are developed from closely spaced profiles collected at archaeological sites in Japan and the USA. The time slices are used to remotely sense archaeological features at several burial mounds and a pit dwelling site. The methodology for creating the time slices and some of the interpretive limitations of…