The lexical quality hypothesis (LQH) claims that variation in the quality of word representations has consequences for reading skill, including comprehension. High lexical quality includes well-specified and partly redundant representations of form (orthography and phonology) and flexible representations of meaning, allowing for rapid and reliable meaning retrieval. Low-quality representations lead to specific word-related problems in…
Scientific Studies of Reading Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Scientific Studies of Reading in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Scientific Studies of Reading format
Scientific Studies of Reading is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Reading and Literacy Development, Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, Language Development and Disorders.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Scientific Studies of Reading 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Scientific Studies of Reading style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Reading and Literacy Development Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills Language Development and Disorders Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism Writing and Handwriting Education |
| ISSN | 1088-8438 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 3.04 |
| h-index | 120 |
| i10-index | 595 |
| Total citations | 56,061 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Florida State University |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Scientific Studies of Reading per year
Citation impact of Scientific Studies of Reading by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Scientific Studies of Reading
The purpose of this article is to consider oral reading fluency as an indicator of overall reading competence. We begin by examining theoretical arguments for supposing that oral reading fluency may reflect overall reading competence. We then summarize several studies substantiating this phenomenon. Next, we provide an historical analysis of the extent to which oral…
Reading words may take several forms. Readers may utilize decoding, analogizing, or predicting to read unfamiliar words. Readers read familiar words by accessing them in memory, called sight word reading. With practice, all words come to be read automatically by sight, which is the most efficient, unobtrusive way to read words in text. The process…
Abstract We reintroduce a wide-angle view of reading comprehension, the Reading Systems Framework, which places word knowledge in the center of the picture, taking into account the progress made in comprehension research and theory. Within this framework, word-to-text integration processes can serve as a model for the study of local comprehension processes, that is, those…
Abstract This study examined the contributions of phonological processing and oral language abilities to reading and reading disabilities in young children. Two approaches were taken. First, 604 participants were divided into good and poor readers on the basis of reading performance in second grade. Reading groups were then compared in terms of kindergarten phonological processing…