Write in a clean editor, then format for Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Healthcare innovation and challenges, Family and Disability Support Research, Disability Rights and Representation.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Healthcare innovation and challenges Family and Disability Support Research Disability Rights and Representation Down syndrome and intellectual disability research Elder Abuse and Neglect |
| ISSN | 2329-7018 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 2.32 |
| h-index | 21 |
| i10-index | 62 |
| Total citations | 2,031 |
| Top institutions publishing here | La Trobe University |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
This article aims to help readers to understand the conceptual link between supported decision making and legal capacity and how this is influencing the development of practice. It examines how the concept has been defined as: a process of supporting a person with decision making; a system that affords legal status; and a means of…
Social inclusion has been an enduring policy aim of intellectual disability policy since the early 1980s, which has been difficult to achieve. It has often been conceptualised as the binary between social presence or social participation. This article synthesises the findings from a program of Australian research that explored the application of “encounter” and “conviviality”…
This paper questions whether Australia's new disability support regime, the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), can meet its aims for people with disabilities who also experience complex social disadvantage, using the examples of people with intellectual disabilities from cultural and linguistically diverse backgrounds and those who cycle in and out of the criminal justice system.…
Over one million Australians have some form of cognitive impairment due to intellectual disability or acquired brain injury and require significant levels of support for decision-making. To date, the range and quality of support available has been poor, often tending toward undue paternalism, with deleterious consequences for the individual's sense of identity and quality of…
The Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme's (NDIS) market-based paradigm, which prioritises “person-centred planning” and “self-directed care”, supports independence and the social and economic participation of participants. This article examines the NDIS's philosophical congruence and whether it affirms the dignity of people with an intellectual disability and enhances their quality of life. A philosophical methodological approach…
