Journal of European CME Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Journal of European CME in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Journal of European CME format
Journal of European CME is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Innovations in Medical Education, Health and Medical Research Impacts, Primary Care and Health Outcomes.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Journal of European CME 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Journal of European CME style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Innovations in Medical Education Health and Medical Research Impacts Primary Care and Health Outcomes Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy Interprofessional Education and Collaboration |
| ISSN | 2161-4083 |
| h-index | 16 |
| i10-index | 32 |
| Total citations | 1,045 |
| Article processing charge | $1,459 |
| Open access | Yes |
| Top institutions publishing here | Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Journal of European CME per year
Citation impact of Journal of European CME by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Journal of European CME
A DiGA is a safe and data-protected interoperable medical device (officially called a “digital health application”) of a low-risk class, which has the potential to improve the healthcare system in Germany for patients – with or without the involvement of a physician. It therefore already represents the first component of the envisaged future digitalised healthcare.…
Net promoter Score (NPS) has been used in many fields, such as software, clinical care, and websites, as a measure of customer satisfaction since 2003. With a single question, NPS methodology is thought to determine brand loyalty and intent to act based on experiences with the brand or product. In the current study, accredited continuing…
The outcomes model most applied in continuing education for the health professions evaluation is Moore and colleagues' conceptual framework. Examination of how the levels interact and the role of confidence and intention to change can help outcomes professionals understand better how to impact clinician practice and conductand report outcomes studies. The current study examined the…
The quality of continuing medical education (CME) is frequently measured using the Moore's Level of Outcome framework, with higher-level outcomes (5 and above) perceived as more valuable than lower-level outcomes (such as Level 3 - knowledge). Higher-level outcomes require more rigorous evaluation, increasing the time requirements of an interaction; however, there is a trend among…