To be a critical military analyst is to be a sceptically curious military analyst. Using a critical feminist approach to studying the military can help to generate more reliable explanations and more realistic accountings of the creation and role of any given military and of broader processes of militarization. This article moves from a memorial…
Critical Military Studies Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Critical Military Studies in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Critical Military Studies format
Critical Military Studies is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Gender, Security, and Conflict, Military History and Strategy, Global Security and Public Health.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Critical Military Studies 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Critical Military Studies style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Gender, Security, and Conflict Military History and Strategy Global Security and Public Health Historical Gender and Feminism Studies Peacebuilding and International Security |
| ISSN | 2333-7486 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.08 |
| h-index | 32 |
| i10-index | 97 |
| Total citations | 3,768 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Newcastle University |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Critical Military Studies per year
Citation impact of Critical Military Studies by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Critical Military Studies
Masculinities in conflict-affected and peacebuilding contexts have generally speaking been under-researched. Much of the existing research focuses relatively narrowly on men and their ‘violences’, especially that of combatants. Conceptually, much of the policy debate has revolved around either men’s ‘innate’ propensity to violence or relatively simplistic uses of frameworks such as hegemonic, military/militarized, or ‘hyper’-masculinities.…
Feminist scholarship on war and militarization has typically focussed on the making of militarized masculinity. However, in this article, we shed light on the process of ‘unmaking’ militarized masculinity through the experiences of veterans transitioning from military to civilian life. We argue that in the twenty-first century, veterans’ successful reintegration into civilian society is integral…
This paper is about the distinctive contributions which contemporary military geography might make to the wider critical military studies project. The paper notes the relative absence of the study of military topics across Anglophone human geography in the second half of the twentieth century, and the resurgence of interest in the spatialities of militarism and…
Recent work on the multiplicity of masculinities within specific military contexts deploys the concept of intersectionality in order to draw attention to the hierarchies present in military organizations or to acknowledge male vulnerability in situations of war and conflict. While it is important to examine the breadth and depth of masculinity as an ideology and…