Write in a clean editor, then format for AJOB Empirical Bioethics in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
AJOB Empirical Bioethics is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Ethics in Clinical Research, Ethics in medical practice, Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." AJOB Empirical Bioethics 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in AJOB Empirical Bioethics style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Ethics in Clinical Research Ethics in medical practice Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare |
| ISSN | 2329-4515 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 2.25 |
| h-index | 32 |
| i10-index | 154 |
| Total citations | 5,046 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Pennsylvania |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
BACKGROUND: As ongoing research explores the impact of moral distress on health care professionals (HCPs) and organizations and seeks to develop effective interventions, valid and reliable instruments to measure moral distress are needed. This article describes the development and testing of a revision of the widely used Moral Distress Scale-Revised (MDS-R) to measure moral distress.…
BACKGROUND: To promote justice in research practice and rectify health disparities, greater diversity in research participation is needed. Lack of trust in medical research is one of the most significant obstacles to research participation. Multiple variables have been identified as factors associated with research participant trust/mistrust. A conceptual model that provides meaningful insight into the…
Vast quantities of personal health information and private identifiable information are being created through mobile apps, wearable sensors, and social networks. While new strategies and tools for obtaining health data have expanded researchers' abilities to design and test personalized and adaptive health interventions, the deployment of pervasive sensing and computational techniques to gather research data…
BACKGROUND: The study identifies the experiences, preferences, and perceptions of research participants regarding dissemination of research findings at the participant level and community level. METHODS: The qualitative study utilized focus-group methodology to explore research participants' experiences and preferences for the dissemination of research findings. Five focus groups were held with 53 participants who were recruited…
BACKGROUND: Guidelines for breaking bad news are largely directed at and validated in oncology patients, based on expert opinion, and neglect those with other diagnoses. We sought to determine whether existing guidelines for breaking bad news, particularly SPIKES, are consistent with patient preferences across patient populations. METHODS: Patients from an online community responded to 5…
