The threat to reproducibility and awareness of current rates of research misbehavior sparked initiatives to better academic science. One initiative is preregistration of quantitative research. We investigate whether the preregistration format could also be used to boost the credibility of qualitative research. A crucial distinction underlying preregistration is that between prediction and postdiction. In qualitative…
Accountability in Research Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Accountability in Research in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Accountability in Research format
Accountability in Research is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Ethics in Clinical Research, Academic integrity and plagiarism, scientometrics and bibliometrics research.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Accountability in Research 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Accountability in Research style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Ethics in Clinical Research Academic integrity and plagiarism scientometrics and bibliometrics research Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Ethics in medical practice |
| ISSN | 0898-9621 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 3.91 |
| h-index | 55 |
| i10-index | 433 |
| Total citations | 16,109 |
| Article processing charge | $3,500 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Maryland, Baltimore |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Accountability in Research per year
Citation impact of Accountability in Research by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Accountability in Research
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image sizeKeywords: Singapore Statementresearch integrityethicsinternational research Acknowledgments This research was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH). It does not represent the views of the NIEHS, NIH, or U.S. government.
Artificial intelligence (AI) natural language processing (NLP) systems, such as OpenAI's generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) model (https://openai. com) or Meta's Galactica (https://galactica.org/)may soon be widely used in many forms of writing, including scientific and scholarly publications (Heaven 2022). 1 While computer programs (such as Microsoft WORD and Grammarly) have incorporated automated text-editing features (such as…
Research misconduct is an international concern. Misconduct policies can play a crucial role in preventing and policing research misconduct, and many institutions have developed their own policies. While institutional policies play a key role in preventing and policing misconduct, national policies are also important to ensure consistent promulgation and enforcement of ethical standards. The purpose…
Researchers and institutional review boards are routinely called upon to evaluate the cost-benefit status of proposed research protocols that involve human participants. Often these assessments are based on subjective judgments in the absence of empirical data. This reliance on subjective judgments is of particular concern for studies involving clinical samples where unfounded assumptions may adversely…