Taylor & Francis

Accountability in Research Template

Write in a clean editor, then format for Accountability in Research in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.

About the Accountability in Research format

Accountability in Research is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Ethics in Clinical Research, Academic integrity and plagiarism, scientometrics and bibliometrics research.

PublisherTaylor & Francis
Reference styleAuthor–year (Chicago, T&F)
Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text
Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Accountability in Research 12 (3): 45–58.

Formats any DOI in Accountability in Research style. No sign-up.

Publishes research inEthics in Clinical Research Academic integrity and plagiarism scientometrics and bibliometrics research Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Ethics in medical practice
ISSN0898-9621
Citation impact (2-yr)3.91
h-index55
i10-index433
Total citations16,109
Article processing charge$3,500
Top institutions publishing hereUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore
Journal websitewww.tandfonline.com
You getA submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit.

Papers published in Accountability in Research per year

24
2014
43
2015
24
2016
27
2017
33
2018
33
2019
57
2020
57
2021
54
2022
74
2023
71
2024
63
2025

Citation impact of Accountability in Research by publication year

449
2014
920
2015
591
2016
413
2017
581
2018
843
2019
1.4K
2020
895
2021
592
2022
1.1K
2023
383
2024
220
2025

Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.

Most-cited papers in Accountability in Research

Preregistering qualitative research

Tamarinde Haven, Leonie van Grootel · 11 Feb 2019

The threat to reproducibility and awareness of current rates of research misbehavior sparked initiatives to better academic science. One initiative is preregistration of quantitative research. We investigate whether the preregistration format could also be used to boost the credibility of qualitative research. A crucial distinction underlying preregistration is that between prediction and postdiction. In qualitative…

The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity

David B. Resnik, Adil E. Shamoo · 3 Mar 2011

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image sizeKeywords: Singapore Statementresearch integrityethicsinternational research Acknowledgments This research was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH). It does not represent the views of the NIEHS, NIH, or U.S. government.

Using AI to write scholarly publications

Mohammad Hosseini, Lisa M. Rasmussen, David B. Resnik · 25 Jan 2023

Artificial intelligence (AI) natural language processing (NLP) systems, such as OpenAI's generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) model (https://openai. com) or Meta's Galactica (https://galactica.org/)may soon be widely used in many forms of writing, including scientific and scholarly publications (Heaven 2022). 1 While computer programs (such as Microsoft WORD and Grammarly) have incorporated automated text-editing features (such as…

An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies

David B. Resnik, Lisa M. Rasmussen, Grace E. Kissling · 30 Apr 2015

Research misconduct is an international concern. Misconduct policies can play a crucial role in preventing and policing research misconduct, and many institutions have developed their own policies. While institutional policies play a key role in preventing and policing misconduct, national policies are also important to ensure consistent promulgation and enforcement of ethical standards. The purpose…

Empirically supported ethical research practice: The costs and benefits of research from the participants’ view

Elana Newman, Traci Willard, Robert R. Sinclair et al. · 1 Jan 2001

Researchers and institutional review boards are routinely called upon to evaluate the cost-benefit status of proposed research protocols that involve human participants. Often these assessments are based on subjective judgments in the absence of empirical data. This reliance on subjective judgments is of particular concern for studies involving clinical samples where unfounded assumptions may adversely…

Accountability in Research template — frequently asked questions

How do I write a paper in the Accountability in Research format?
In DocuGuru you write your manuscript in a normal editor — no LaTeX setup required — and select the Accountability in Research template. When you export, DocuGuru compiles the paper into the official Taylor & Francis format and hands you a submission-ready PDF along with the editable LaTeX source.
What reference style does Accountability in Research use?
Accountability in Research uses Author–year (Chicago, T&F) references, shown as author–year markers such as (Smith, 2023) in the text. DocuGuru formats every in-text citation and the reference list in this exact style automatically. A reference appears like this: Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Accountability in Research 12 (3): 45–58.
Do I need to know LaTeX to submit to Accountability in Research?
No. DocuGuru generates the interact LaTeX class and compiles the PDF for you in the background, so you get a Taylor & Francis-ready Accountability in Research document without writing any LaTeX. If you do want it, the LaTeX source is included in the export.
Can I import an existing draft into the Accountability in Research template?
Yes. Paste or upload your current manuscript — Word, LaTeX, Markdown, or plain text — and DocuGuru reflows it into the Accountability in Research format with correct headings, figures, tables, and author–year citations.
Who publishes Accountability in Research?
Accountability in Research is a multidisciplinary journal published by Taylor & Francis. DocuGuru's Accountability in Research template matches Taylor & Francis's official submission format.
Can I export a submission-ready Accountability in Research PDF?
Yes — DocuGuru produces a PDF built with the official Accountability in Research template (the interact class) that is ready to submit to Taylor & Francis, together with the matching LaTeX source files.
How much does the Accountability in Research template cost?
You can start writing in the Accountability in Research template for free. Exporting the final submission-ready Accountability in Research PDF and LaTeX source is part of DocuGuru's paid plans — see the app for current pricing.
Use the Accountability in Research template