Abstract The Covid-19 pandemic has led to an enormous increase in the use of technology in the courtroom. This development raises the important question on the potential effects of the digitalisation of criminal justice—especially from the viewpoint of the right to a fair trial. This contribution discusses this complicated question from different angles. It focuses…
China-EU Law Journal Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for China-EU Law Journal in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Springer Nature template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the China-EU Law Journal format
China-EU Law Journal is a peer-reviewed journal published by Springer Nature, covering International Arbitration and Investment Law, European and International Law Studies, Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction.
| Publisher | Springer Nature |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered (Springer Basic) Numbered — [1], [2] in the text 1. Smith A, Jones B, Lee C (2023) A representative article title. China-EU Law Journal 12:45–58
Formats any DOI in China-EU Law Journal style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | International Arbitration and Investment Law European and International Law Studies Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction Corporate Governance and Law World Trade Organization Law |
| ISSN | 1868-5153 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 2.75 |
| h-index | 10 |
| i10-index | 10 |
| Total citations | 360 |
| Article processing charge | $2,890 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Maastricht University |
| Journal website | www.springer.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in China-EU Law Journal per year
Citation impact of China-EU Law Journal by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in China-EU Law Journal
The dispute between the EU and China regarding the trade in solar panels has been commonly explained in terms of power politics, whereby a mercantile China exploited European internal divisions to its advantage. But the trade defence case was also criticized for running against European climate policy goals. To which extent does this case illustrate…