Despite strong popular conceptions of gender differences in emotionality and striking gender differences in the prevalence of disorders thought to involve emotion dysregulation, the literature on the neural bases of emotion regulation is nearly silent regarding gender differences (Gross, 2007; Ochsner & Gross, in press). The purpose of the present study was to address this…
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Group Processes & Intergroup Relations in one click — DocuGuru applies the official SAGE template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Group Processes & Intergroup Relations format
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations is a peer-reviewed journal published by SAGE, covering Social and Intergroup Psychology, Cultural Differences and Values, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment.
| Publisher | SAGE |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Harvard) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, A., Jones, B. and Lee, C. (2023) 'A representative article title', Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(3), pp. 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Social and Intergroup Psychology Cultural Differences and Values Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment Gender Diversity and Inequality Racial and Ethnic Identity Research |
| ISSN | 1368-4302 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 3.43 |
| h-index | 123 |
| i10-index | 1,090 |
| Total citations | 66,295 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Kent |
| Journal website | www.sagepub.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations per year
Citation impact of Group Processes & Intergroup Relations by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
The present article offers a conceptual model for how the cognitive processes associated with perspective-taking facilitate social coordination and foster social bonds. We suggest that the benefits of perspective-taking accrue through an increased self-other overlap in cognitive representations and discuss the implications of this perspective-taking induced self-other overlap for stereotyping and prejudice. Whereas perspective-taking decreases…
From evolutionary psychological reasoning, we derived the hypothesis that chronic and contextually aroused feelings of vulnerability to disease motivate negative reactions to foreign peoples. The hypothesis was tested and supported across four correlational studies: chronic disease worries predicted implicit cognitions associating foreign outgroups with danger, and also predicted less positive attitudes toward foreign (but not…
The Contact Hypothesis has long been considered one of psychology’s most effective strategies for improving intergroup relations. In this article, we review the history of the development of the Contact Hypothesis, and then we examine recent developments in this area. Specifically, we consider the conditions that are required for successful contact to occur (e.g. cooperation),…
Two studies investigated intergroup contact with immigrants in Italy. In Study 1 ( N = 310 students) contact had direct positive effects on perceived out-group variability and out-group attitude, and a direct negative effect on subtle prejudice; the last two effects were mediated by intergroup anxiety. Contact also had a greater effect on reduced anxiety…