Vanderbilt law review Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Vanderbilt law review in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Vanderbilt law review format
Vanderbilt law review is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Legal Systems and Judicial Processes, Legal and Constitutional Studies, Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Vanderbilt law review 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Vanderbilt law review has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Legal Systems and Judicial Processes Legal and Constitutional Studies Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems American Constitutional Law and Politics Law, Rights, and Freedoms |
| ISSN | 0042-2533 |
| h-index | 38 |
| i10-index | 166 |
| Total citations | 6,538 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Richmond |
| Journal website | www.vanderbiltlawreview.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Vanderbilt law review per year
Citation impact of Vanderbilt law review by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Vanderbilt law review
Introduction It took courage for Professor Patrick Schiltz to write the article that opens this symposium issue of the Vanderbilt Law Review. At the Notre Dame Law School, where Professor Schiltz teaches, as at the Vanderbilt University Law School and all elite schools, most graduates go to work in private practice, most often at large…
Forensic identification science involves two fundamental steps. The first step is to compare a questioned item of evidence to an exemplar from a known source and judge whether they appear so alike that they can be said to match. The second step is to assess the meaning of that reported match: What is the probability…