Write in a clean editor, then format for Politics & Gender in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Politics & Gender is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Gender Politics and Representation, Electoral Systems and Political Participation, Gender, Security, and Conflict.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Politics & Gender 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Politics & Gender has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Gender Politics and Representation Electoral Systems and Political Participation Gender, Security, and Conflict Historical Gender and Feminism Studies Social Policy and Reform Studies |
| ISSN | 1743-923X |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.81 |
| h-index | 86 |
| i10-index | 584 |
| Total citations | 32,365 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights |
| Journal website | www.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
In the 10 years that I have conducted intersectional research, my views have changed significantly in terms of how I conceptualize the subspecialization. Originally I thought of intersectionality as a content-based specialization that emphasized the subjectivity of women who reside at the intersections of race-, gender-, class-, and sexual orientation–based marginalizations (and other categories of…
This article integrates the comparative literature on gender quotas with the existing body of research on women's substantive representation. Quota laws, which bring greater numbers of women into parliaments, are frequently assumed to improve women's substantive representation. We use the Argentine case, where a law mandating a 30% gender quota was adopted in 1991, to…
Research on women and representation has argued that women who serve in “skewed” legislatures—that is, legislatures in which women make up less than 15% of the membership—avoid addressing women's interests and are marginalized by other legislators. I argue that women in such legislatures may actually be encouraged to develop legislative agendas that are distinct from…
Why develop a comparative politics of gender? As the critical perspectives in this section demonstrate, there are many answers to this question. I would like to focus here on two reasons: first, for gaining a deeper understanding of the operations of political institutions, and second, for explaining the relationship between these institutions and social actors,…
In recent years, more than a hundred countries have adopted quotas for the selection of female candidates to political office. Examining individual cases of quota reform, scholars offer four basic causal stories to explain quota adoption: Women mobilize for quotas to increase women's representation, political elites recognize strategic advantages for supporting quotas, quotas are consistent…
