Write in a clean editor, then format for Episteme in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Episteme is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics, Philosophy and Theoretical Science, Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Episteme 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Episteme has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy and Theoretical Science Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies Political Philosophy and Ethics Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment |
| ISSN | 1742-3600 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.98 |
| h-index | 64 |
| i10-index | 364 |
| Total citations | 18,596 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Edinburgh |
| Journal website | www.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
ABSTRACT Discussion of the phenomena of post-truth and fake news often implicates the closed epistemic networks of social media. The recent conversation has, however, blurred two distinct social epistemic phenomena. An epistemic bubble is a social epistemic structure in which other relevant voices have been left out, perhaps accidentally. An echo chamber is a social…
ABSTRACT This paper investigates the epistemic powers of democratic institutions through an assessment of three epistemic models of democracy: the Condorcet Jury Theorem, the Diversity Trumps Ability Theorem, and Dewey's experimentalist model. Dewey's model is superior to the others in its ability to model the epistemic functions of three constitutive features of democracy: the epistemic…
Responsible public policy making in a technological society must rely on complex scientific reasoning. Given that ordinary citizens cannot directly assess such reasoning, does this call the democratic legitimacy of technical public policies in question? It does not, provided citizens can make reliable second-order assessments of the consensus of trustworthy scientific experts. I develop criteria…
ABSTRACT Miranda Fricker's important study of epistemic injustice is focussed primarily on testimonial injustice and hermeneutic injustice. It explores how agents' capacities to make assertions and provide testimony can be impaired in ways that can involve forms of distinctively epistemic injustice. My paper identifies a wider range of forms of epistemic injustice that do not…
Philosophical epistemology is concerned with knowledge and related phenomena such as belief. In order to have a general label for such phenomena I shall refer to them as cognitive states . Differing accounts of a variety of cognitive states have been produced. For instance, according to one venerable – if debated – account of knowledge,…
