Write in a clean editor, then format for Economics and Philosophy in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Economics and Philosophy is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Economic Theory and Institutions, Political Philosophy and Ethics, Legal case studies and regulations.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Economics and Philosophy 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Economics and Philosophy has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Economic Theory and Institutions Political Philosophy and Ethics Legal case studies and regulations Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics |
| ISSN | 0266-2671 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.88 |
| h-index | 81 |
| i10-index | 400 |
| Total citations | 24,896 |
| Top institutions publishing here | London School of Economics and Political Science |
| Journal website | journals.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Suppose that the members of a certain group each hold a rational set of judgments on some interconnected questions. And imagine that the group itself now has to form a collective, rational set of judgments on those questions. How should it go about dealing with this task? We argue that the question raised is subject…
Why is (it that) common priors are implicit or explicit in the vast majority of the differential information literature in economics and game theory? Why has the economic community been unwilling, in practice, to accept and actually use the idea of truly personal probabilities in much the same way that it did accept the idea…
Game theory has proved a useful tool in the study of simple economic models. However, numerous foundational issues remain unresolved. The situation is particularly confusing in respect of the non-cooperative analysis of games with some dynamic structure in which the choice of one move or another during the play of the game may convey valuable…
This paper aims to illuminate some issues in the equality, priority, or what debate. I characterize egalitarianism and prioritarianism, respond to the view that we should care about sufficiency or compassion rather than equality or priority, discuss the levelling down objection, and illustrate the significance of the distinction between prioritarianism and egalitarianism, establishing that the…
Any defense of universal norms involves drawing distinctions among the many things people actually desire. If it is to have any content at all, it will say that some objects of desire are more central than others for political purposes, more indispensable to a human being's quality of life. Any wise such approach will go…
