Write in a clean editor, then format for Archaeological Dialogues in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Archaeological Dialogues is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Archaeology and ancient environmental studies, Archaeological Research and Protection, Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Archaeological Dialogues 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Archaeological Dialogues has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Archaeology and ancient environmental studies Archaeological Research and Protection Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation |
| ISSN | 1380-2038 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.33 |
| h-index | 46 |
| i10-index | 175 |
| Total citations | 9,401 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel |
| Journal website | journals.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
This article seeks to reverse the emphasis, in current studies of material culture, on the materiality of objects as against the properties of materials. Drawing on James Gibson's tripartite division of the inhabited environment into medium, substances and surfaces, it is argued that the forms of things are not imposed from without upon an inert…
In recent years the development of a phenomenological archaeology has provoked considerable discussion within the discipline, particularly within British prehistory. This paper provides a review of this challenging body of research, outlining its problems and potentials and setting it within its broader disciplinary context. Phenomenology has been used to great effect to critique the Cartesian…
Abstract In this article, we wish to return to the suggestion made by Sarah Tarlow a decade ago about the importance of understanding emotions in archaeology as a central facet of human being and human actions. We suggest a further expansion of this that focuses exclusively on the relationship between material culture and emotions (as…
Abstract This essay argues that Romanization revolves around understanding objects in motion and that Roman archaeologists should therefore focus on (1) globalization theory and (2) material-culture studies as important theoretical directions for the (near) future. The present state and scope of the Romanization debate, however, seem to prevent a fruitful development in that direction. The…
This article examines the role of red deer antler ‘masks’ recovered from the Early Mesolithic site of Star Carr in northern England. It explores the agency of animals and the type of agency attributable to objects made from parts of animals at the site. When humans use or wear objects that are made from animal…
