Write in a clean editor, then format for Research in Nursing & Health in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Wiley template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Research in Nursing & Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley, covering Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes, Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership, Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum.
| Publisher | Wiley |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Research in Nursing & Health 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Research in Nursing & Health style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum Health Sciences Research and Education Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation |
| ISSN | 0160-6891 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.59 |
| h-index | 149 |
| i10-index | 1,783 |
| Total citations | 158,810 |
| Article processing charge | $3,760 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Marymount University |
| Journal website | onlinelibrary.wiley.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
The general view of descriptive research as a lower level form of inquiry has influenced some researchers conducting qualitative research to claim methods they are really not using and not to claim the method they are using: namely, qualitative description. Qualitative descriptive studies have as their goal a comprehensive summary of events in the everyday…
Scale developers often provide evidence of content validity by computing a content validity index (CVI), using ratings of item relevance by content experts. We analyzed how nurse researchers have defined and calculated the CVI, and found considerable consistency for item-level CVIs (I-CVIs). However, there are two alternative, but unacknowledged, methods of computing the scale-level index…
Nurse researchers typically provide evidence of content validity for instruments by computing a content validity index (CVI), based on experts' ratings of item relevance. We compared the CVI to alternative indexes and concluded that the widely-used CVI has advantages with regard to ease of computation, understandability, focus on agreement of relevance rather than agreement per…
"Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description?" (Sandelowski, 2000) was written to critique the prevailing tendency in qualitative health research to claim the use of methods that were not actually used and to clarify a methodological approach rarely identified as a distinctive method. The article has generated several misconceptions, most notably that qualitative description requires no interpretation…
A common misconception about sampling in qualitative research is that numbers are unimportant in ensuring the adequacy of a sampling strategy. Yet, simple sizes may be too small to support claims of having achieved either informational redundancy or theoretical saturation, or too large to permit the deep, case-oriented analysis that is the raison-d'être of qualitative…
