Ratio Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Ratio in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Wiley template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Ratio format
Ratio is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley, covering Philosophy and Theoretical Science, Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics, Philosophical Ethics and Theory.
| Publisher | Wiley |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Ratio 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Ratio style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Philosophy and Theoretical Science Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophical Ethics and Theory Free Will and Agency Philosophy and History of Science |
| ISSN | 0034-0006 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.66 |
| h-index | 61 |
| i10-index | 353 |
| Total citations | 17,881 |
| Article processing charge | $2,630 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Reading |
| Journal website | www.wiley.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Ratio per year
Citation impact of Ratio by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Ratio
Normative requirements are often overlooked, but they are central features of the normative world. Rationality is often thought to consist in acting for reasons, but following normative requirements is also a major part of rationality. In particular, correct reasoning – both theoretical and practical – is governed by normative requirements rather than by reasons. This…
Abstract I argue against two popular claims. The first is a descriptive, empirical thesis about the nature of ordinary human experience: ‘each of us constructs and lives a “narrative” . . . this narrative is us, our identities’ (Oliver Sacks); ‘self is a perpetually rewritten story . . . in the end, we become the…
Abstract Non‐moral ignorance can exculpate: if Anne spoons cyanide into Bill's coffee, but thinks she is spooning sugar, then Anne may be blameless for poisoning Bill. Gideon Rosen argues that moral ignorance can also exculpate: if one does not believe that one's action is wrong, and one has not mismanaged one's beliefs, then one is…