Write in a clean editor, then format for New Directions for Evaluation in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Wiley template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
New Directions for Evaluation is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley, covering Evaluation and Performance Assessment, Educational Assessment and Improvement, Health Policy Implementation Science.
| Publisher | Wiley |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." New Directions for Evaluation 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in New Directions for Evaluation style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Evaluation and Performance Assessment Educational Assessment and Improvement Health Policy Implementation Science Public Policy and Administration Research Community Health and Development |
| ISSN | 1097-6736 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.86 |
| h-index | 68 |
| i10-index | 430 |
| Total citations | 21,700 |
| Article processing charge | $3,140 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Minnesota |
| Journal website | onlinelibrary.wiley.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Abstract This chapter situates Guba and Lincoln's chapter within the broad philosophical debate about the justifiability of interpretations. The emergence of a new paradigm of inquiry (naturalistic) has, unsurprisingly enough, led to a demand for rigorous criteria that meet traditional standards of inquiry. Two sets are suggested, one of which, the “trustworthiness” criteria, parallels conventional…
Abstract This chapter posits two principal streams of participatory evaluation, practical participatory evaluation and transformative participatory evaluation, and compares them on a set of dimensions relating to control, level, and range of participation. The authors then situate them among other forms of collaborative evaluations.
Abstract Theory‐based evaluation examines conditions of program implementation and mechanisms that mediate between processes and outcomes as a means to understand when and how programs work.
Abstract Current stances on mixing methods and paradigms are described and critiqued. Ideas are offered for advancing mixed‐method evaluation beyond age‐worn paradigm debates.
Abstract Impact evaluations assess the degree to which changes in outcomes can be attributed to an intervention rather than to other factors. Such attribution requires knowing what outcomes would have looked like in the absence of the intervention. This counterfactual world can be inferred only indirectly through evaluation designs that control for confounding factors. Some…
