London Business School Review Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for London Business School Review in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Wiley template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the London Business School Review format
London Business School Review is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley, covering Leadership and Management in Organizations, Biotechnology and Related Fields, Sharing Economy and Platforms.
| Publisher | Wiley |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." London Business School Review 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in London Business School Review style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Leadership and Management in Organizations Biotechnology and Related Fields Sharing Economy and Platforms Educational Leadership and Practices Human Resource and Talent Management |
| ISSN | 2057-1607 |
| h-index | 8 |
| i10-index | 8 |
| Total citations | 424 |
| Top institutions publishing here | London Business School |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in London Business School Review per year
Citation impact of London Business School Review by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in London Business School Review
LBS experts give their take on what it takes, inspired by Stephen R Covey's bestseller
Once a tech company achieves market dominance, mutually reinforcing factors make it almost impossible to displace, says Patrick Barwise
Conventional banking is safer than a decade ago but, says Richard Portes , risk from the non‐banking sector could spread to the rest of the global financial system
We're more likely to excuse leaders' false claims if we can imagine a scenario where they might be true — but only if they fit with our personal views, says Daniel Effron